UNO BY PLAYERMAKER

Share This Post

Mark Holmes tests out UNO BY PLAYERMAKER. The new wearable tracker that allows grassroots footballers to have their physical and technical stats delivered to their phone.

In March 2019, I wrote about a new motion sensor that straps to boots and allows football clubs to not only track their players’ physical data but also collect technical insights such as number of possessions, number of touches per possession, releases per foot and more. If ever there had been a hiding place before, there certainly wasn’t one for anyone wearing these.

As a terribly unfit amateur footballer with a left foot for standing on only, I summed up the article simply by saying: “We’re glad we’ll never have to wear these.”

Playermaker, the company behind the tracker, clearly took that as a challenge: two years down the line they got in touch to say that they had launched the UNO, their new tracker aimed at individuals, whether they be academy players looking to improve their game or amateur footballers like me.

More than 150 elite academies and clubs including Fulham, Rangers, Norwich, Millwall, FC Copenhagen and even the Argentinian FA have used Playermaker’s technology since 2017, but now anyone seeking a competitive edge can buy the UNO to access all these insights, benchmark themselves against pros in the app, see where they need to improve and maybe even use the data to help win them contracts à la Kevin De Bruyne.

As for me, despite my brain screaming at me that it could only end in humiliation, I agreed to not only wear the UNO kit but to share my stats on the internet afterwards. I have previously worn a GPS vest, which was embarrassing enough, but now I was about to find out how much I have regressed physically and how bad I am technically.

In fairness, it did seem like a pretty good time to do it. I had scored four goals and set up three more in my two games prior to wearing the UNO. We won those games by an aggregate score of 10-2, and our next game looked well winnable too, against a team beneath us in the table.

The inevitable

You all know what happened next. We lost 4-2 and I didn’t score or assist. Obviously. From the moment I had agreed to wear the UNO, it was bound to happen. It was up there with the most inevitable results of all time.

And to make matters worse, I’d spent pretty much the entirety of the second half moaning that I wasn’t getting the ball. As a centre-forward, there are games when it feels like you’re involved every time the ball’s in the opposition’s half and games when, for whatever reason, it just will not come to you. This was one of those games.

Was it a deliberate ploy by my teammates to make my stats look worse? We can’t rule it out.

Before we get to said stats, some mitigation. I’m thirty-six in June, it was a red-hot day and I’m still feeling the effects of breaking my tibia and fibula in October 2018. So that at least justifies some of the less-than-impressive physical data the UNO returned from my first ninety minutes wearing it. As for the technical data, well, I don’t really have an excuse for that. I certainly can’t blame the UNO, because after a few minutes I forgot I even had it on.

The kit consists of two motion sensors marked L and R which you insert into straps that fit over your boots. The sensors sit on the side of your heels so don’t interfere with any ball touches, and it’s so lightweight that you don’t notice it when running.

So, my stats…

Physical data

I covered 7.9km over the ninety minutes, an average of 865 metres covered per ten minutes, which the app informs me is significantly more than the UNO community average of 793km for a centre-forward but unsurprisingly not even close to the benchmark for elite players.

It was also slightly less than the 8.04km I covered back in September 2018, but let’s see how much running Roberto Firmino’s doing when he’s nearly thirty-six. Nobody can stop the sands of time, mate. And as I like to tell my teammates, I’m just conserving energy for all those high-intensity sprints I do.

There were twenty-one of those, according to the app, and I reached a top spot of 24.3kph. That’s slightly down on the average of 24.9kph, but fifty-six accelerations and decelerations over the ninety minutes is above average. 

I plan on using all this data in negotiations to have my £7-a-week subs waived. Above average distance covered? They should be paying me.

Technical data

Like most amateur footballers, I have convinced myself many, many times that I’m technically good enough to play in the Premier League. If only I was fit enough, I could do what Olivier Giroud does, no problem.

Joking (slightly) aside, I’ve always thought of myself as very sound technically. I’m decent receiving the ball with my back to goal, I’ve got a turn in me, I can finish and I create a lot of chances dropping back to No.10 and playing our wide forwards in behind.

Indeed, I did that several times in the first half of this game, setting up two or three chances for teammates before my Invisibility Cloak took effect at half-time. I also had a goal narrowly ruled out for offside. Nice finish, too.

The app tells me that 56% of my possessions were one-touch, 33% were short possessions and 11% were long possessions. It also tells me that every time I got the ball, I managed to release it. In other words, I wasn’t dispossessed once.

This is genuinely incredible data for someone playing in the Manchester Saturday Morning Football League to be able to see. And I’m pretty chuffed with it too: get the ball into me and I’ll look after it for you. I even had a higher percentage of one-touch possessions than the elite player average. They’re clearly not playing enough Rondo.

The app also tells me that I received the ball with my right foot 88% of the time and, hilariously, released it with my right 100% of the time. Who needs a left foot anyway?

But I’ve saved the best (worst) piece of data until last. We know how much I ran, how quickly I did it and how I used the ball when I got it, but how many times did I actually touch it?

Eighteen. One-eight. Eighteen, FFS! OK, so the tracker can’t count headers, but eighteen is still utterly ridiculous. I knew I hadn’t been involved much in the second half, but never in a million years would I have guessed I’d touched it that little.

It’s not unusual as a centre-forward to make runs that aren’t used, but eighteen ball possessions has sent me into a period of deep reflection. The UNO hasn’t just provided me with insights into my performance, it’s got me questioning my life choices. Should I just go for shuttle runs on a Saturday morning instead?

Suffice to say, I shared this data with my teammates along with some of my thoughts. Hit the big man, lads!

Even if it doesn’t inspire them to pass it to me more, the UNO has certainly inspired me. Because like every other human, I’m obsessed with self-improvement. I want more touches, more sprints, more distance covered. Maybe even the odd left-foot pass.

And that is perhaps the UNO’s greatest asset. It’s a lot of fun for an amateur player like me, but for an academy player looking for that advantage over everyone else chasing a pro contract, these insights could make an enormous difference.

As for me, we’ll see what improvements the UNO can inspire me to make in the coming weeks. Olivier Giroud, watch out.

You can purchase the Playermaker UNO Kit using Grassroots Post’s exclusive 15% discount code grassrootspost at www.playermakeruno.co.uk.

Related Posts

SPOND: SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITY VITAL TO FUTURE OF GRASSROOTS

Leading sports team management app Spond has taken the...

HOW TO RUN A GRASSROOTS FOOTBALL CLUB

Knowing how to run a grassroots football club is...

A DERBY EVERY WEEK! WORLD’S SMALLEST LEAGUE

To take a boat from Penzance is not to...

PETER HARDING: TURNING TRAUMA INTO ACTION

In each issue, we shine a light on disability...

BROCKWELL UNITED LAUNCH NEW KIT!

Brockwell United Football Club (BUFC) is excited to be...

HOW TO RUN A LEAGUE: BARNET SUNDAYS

1966 was a great year for English football: the...